'Water deposit' revives open wells
Thanks to voluntary water harvesting measures by a few, as well as legislation-led RWH by the others, many of Chennai's open wells have sprung back to life. The bountiful rains of 2005 showed that where conservation efforts are in place, even a single season's rainfall can largely restore water security. Shree Padre reports.
Bayview Apartments, a multi-storeyed residential complex located in Besant Nagar, Chennai consists of 140 flats in five blocks. Each block in the complex, which was built in 1988, has an open well. Since the community was able to access sufficiently good water within its premises, the residents have been meeting their needs with this well water, and have skipped going to the Chennai Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewerage Board (CMWSSB) for their water connection.
Skipping the municipal supplier’s services has made the residents prone to a higher risk of being without water, but they have managed so far. In 1999, the open wells went dry. Two shallow borewells per block, 45 to 50 ft. deep, were dug. There was reasonably good water in them. And the very next year, all the open wells were also further deepened by 20 feet, taking their total depth also to 44 feet each. And this arrangement sufficed for the next few years. In fact, though the wells were deepened, from 1999 onwards, they used only the water from the bore wells.
But in 2004, however, the borewell water began to turn brackish, and thus unfit for cooking and drinking. The residents had to purchase so-called ‘mineral water’ in 20-litre PET cans. Each 20-litre can costs between Rs.20 and Rs.50 depending on the brand, and lasts four to seven days. Thus, each family spent thousands of rupees each year buying water for their cooking and drinking needs. And for everything else, they continued using borewell water.
Sekhar Raghavan, a veteran rainwater harvesting activist, lives in this apartments, and his persistent efforts have helped keep the apartment community ahead of many others in preparing for shortages, and also in preventing them in the first place. In 2000, much before it was made mandatory by the government, this complex had extensively implemented rainwater harvesting (RWH). The rooftop water was led into the open wells after filtration. The driveway runoff was intercepted near the gates and injected into recharge wells - each three feet in diameter and 10 feet deep - covered with perforated RCC slabs. And since the road level here is higher than the site level, rain falling on the road would also flow into these recharge wells. This was a bonus! Bayview Apartments, thus deposited all the rain water it received in mother earth’s bank!

Following the legislation that made RWH mandatory in 2002-2003 all houses in Besant Nagar, like elsewhere in the state have implemented it. Thanks to voluntary RWH measures of Bayview Apartment and legislation-led RWH by all the residents around, coupled with the city’s record rainfall of 2005, the open wells, which were almost dry for seven years turned alive in 2006. They were three-fourths full! Recalls Sekhar, “When all our wells dried in 1999, I was still hopeful that they would one day come back alive. But I did not expect it to happen so quickly.”
In Bayview apartments, all the 140 families living here have now gone back to the well water for everything except drinking. Thirty per cent of them are using it even for drinking. Why only 30 per cent? Sekhar has a ready answer. “Using mineral water is an addiction. Seventy per cent of our residents still continue to buy it, though it is unnecessary. They were earlier using it for both drinking and cooking; now its use is confined to drinking only. For all other purposes well water is used.” Bayview hasn’t yet stopped using the bore wells, either; about 20 per cent of the requirement is met from this source, and even this water has been quite good of late.
It is not only the quantity of water available that has improved since the rains of 2005. The brackishness of the water, which was evident not so long ago, also has reduced dramatically. Points out Sekhar, “The TDS (Total Dissolved Salts) of our groundwater is now 500 parts per million (ppm), implying very good quality.”
“When all our wells dried in 1999, I was still hopeful that they would one day come back alive. But I did not expect it to happen so quickly.”
In the wake of that good monsoon, Sekhar had conducted a survey on increase of groundwater in Chennai as a result of mandatory RWH. Says he, “The average rise in the water table in the last three years was six to eight metres.” Some other interesting outcomes: Only 50 per cent of the residents had really understood RWH and had done a reasonably good job. The remaining 50 per cent had done it only to comply with the law and to avoid the punishment of disconnection of municipal water supply. A majority of the residents did not even know what RWH structures are all about, and where they were located in their premises. Only 20 per cent of the residents had voluntarily harvested the driveway runoff too within their premises. The others were content to harvest only the runoff from their rooftops.
Sekhar received some very inspiring feedback to the survey. He adds, “I did hear of dry wells coming back alive from a few other residents in other parts of the city as well. One resident informed me that his well, which had remained dry for almost 35 years, came back alive.”
Coastal communities
Even while digging these shallow bore wells way back in 1999, a lot of precautions were taken. Water samples were tested every foot during digging. Why this precaution? “Because of the close proximity of our apartment to the sea”, Sekhar explains, “fresh water floats on salt water and there is an interface. One does not know till what depth the fresh water aquifer extends and where the interface starts. As such, we have to be very careful while digging. If we dig up to and beyond the interface then brackish water would mix with the top fresh water making all the water brackish.”
The Rain Centre
4, Third Trust Link Rd.
Mandavallipakkam
Santhome, Chennai
Tel: 2461-6134.
Contact: Sekhar Raghavan
[email removed]
“Living close to the sea is as dangerous as it is beautiful,” he warns. “The aquifer is like a goose which lays golden eggs. People should not be greedy and over exploit groundwater. Some feel that it has already gone bad and it would never improve, and so they over exploit. To such people I would like to say that the more it has become bad, the lesser should be the extraction, and only then it would improve. People should learn to live not only with less water but also of different qualities for different end uses.”
As the director of Rain Cenre, Chennai’s one-stop information clearance house on urban RWH, Sekhar is spending his time spreading awareness. According to him, “it’s time for a Save the Wells campaign to protect our open wells from people who are keen to close them. Many people have a wrong notion about open wells. In cities, once a family gets tap water, their open wells are either abandoned or filled up. Another important group is the Vaasthu group, which suddenly realizes that well is not located in the proper place namely, north-east corner of the plot and wants it to be closed. For those people who feel that a dry well is of no use and hence it should be filled up”, advices Sekhar, “our story can be an eye-opener. An open well can and will come back alive with RWH and a fairly good monsoon for even one year. I have been telling residents of my area not to fill up their open wells. It can always be used as a recharge well. If not, we have to spend several thousand rupees to create a recharge well.”
If there is one arena in the city where his efforts have had little reward, it is the government itself! After legislating that each of the residents do something to harvest their water, it appears to have closed the book. The city corporation has not done anything to harvest water in the open areas under its control. The runoff is channelled to storm water drains constructed on one or both sides of the road, discharged into the nearby river and ultimately to the sea.
Filed under
Cite this article
Shree Padre (2007) ‘'Water deposit' revives open wells’, India Together, 19 March 2007. https://indiatogether.org/rwhchen-environment/
4 reader responses
Add a response
Vishwanath · 20 March 2007
A usual SP writes a very nice rainwater article coming from the heart. Anecdotally and morally the argument for rainwater harvesting has been made and made with great force. Now is the time to move forward more systematically to embed it in the greater context of delivering water to our urban citizens in a sustainable and affordable fashion. In m view we need critical decision making on 1. The role of an institution to manage groundwater and foster rainwater harvesting. Unless our water 'supply' boards become water 'management' boards the move will not happen quickly enough. 2. We need to develop a critical understanding of urban aquifers. What is their holding capacity? What is their recharge capacity? What are he most susceptible to from quantity and quality perspective? How do we insulate them from pollution? How do we recharge and use them as a bank? What is the best method of recharge? Revival of urban lakes or individual recharge wells or both? Where does recharge work most effectively? Where is recharge not possible? All these questions need answers. 3. Sekhar would be the first to agree that the spread of rainwater harvesting requires ownership. How is that to be generated amongst institutions? 4. Should rainwater harvesting remain a peoples initiative or is there merit in both people and institutions involving themselves? 5. Why is it not realised that groundwater provides a significant part of the cities' water at the cheapest rate? If hand pumps have water it is the poor who will access it the most. I hope SP's article will act as a spur for such debates and Sekhar's work will inspire others too to look at rain positively
V S Ravikumar · 20 March 2007
Commendable effort. The Rain Centre should be watered to grow further.
MG Chandrakanth · 30 March 2007
Kudos to Shekar and Shree Padre for the info on RWH and improvement in water levels. While the water supplies in the open well/s would have increased because of RWH. However, I request Sekhar to ask maybe Anna University or the Geology Dept in Chennai to validate his observation that the water table (or level) in wells have improved by 18 to 24 feet. This may be water level in open wells due to RWH, but is this the groundwater table in general? This is difficult to say. In coastal aquifers if this is really true, I think that deserves greater attention, since that can reduce hard water and increase volume of soft water and also reduce several associated diseases in human beings and costs of corrosion in metals, cars, pumps, pipes etc. While injection wells do exist to improve recharge, and if we can consider open wells as injection wells, what is their area of operation? Will the cone of interference concept, be applicable or is as similar to cone of recharge too? If cone of interference is equivalent to the cone of recharge, approximately, then what Shekhar is pointing out, may be acceptable after subject it to hydro-geological testing.
Sekhar Raghavan · 18 April 2007
Dear Prof. Chandrakanth, Thanks for your mail appreciating me and Shree Padre for our work in groundwater recharge (GWR) through RWH. It is very rarely that we, grassroot level workers, get such mail or letters appreciating our efforts. I would like to share with you some of my thoughts, anxieties and experiences in RWH. I) All of us NGOs, GOs, Academics, a few committed individuals and organizations etc. are trying to understand Nature in our own way. Being a physicist, I can tell you in Physics, there are two groups experimental and theoretical. Myself, Shree Padre, Vishwanath and a few other individuals and organizations belong to the former and a few GOs and Academics belong to the latter. As experimentalists, we keep doing several activities in RWH and publish them in the print media such as Newspapers, Weeklyand monthly magazines and certain Conference Proceedings (these are our journals). It is for the theoreticians to interpret and explain our results. Unfortunately, this never happens in our country. Not a single individual from the academic community has openly appreciated our work like what you have done though all of them are my good friends. Most of them do not take us seriously, leave alone appreciating, helping and supporting our activities. They probably feel threatened. In fact, their design of RWH structures are faulty not supported by field experience. Hence it is for Anna University or IIT or Geology department to validate our observations and not vice versa. (Forgive me for being frank in my views and opinions. In my previous avatar, I was a theoretical physicist, sitting on the other side of the table.) II) Our claim that the water table has risen by 6 to 8 metres (20 to 26 ft.) is the stabilized groundwater table in general, based on our observations done in January 2006, almost one month after the 2005 north east monsoon. This is also true in the coastal suburbs of Chennai (within 1000 metres from the coast line) like Besant Nagar and Valmiki Nagar. Most of us living in Bayview Apartments in Besant Nagar drink the water from our open wells. These had gone dry a few years back but came back alive during 2005 monsoon and filled up to two thirds its volume. During the dry period, our groundwater extracted through the borewells had also become brackish (TDS went upto 2000 ppm.), which has now become potable. I have been monitoring the water level in four of our open wells periodically and I have the details. If some of your colleagues in the Geology dept. can help us to evaluate our observations, I can furnish them and if they have any specific suggestion, I am willing to carry it out. With regards, Sekhar Raghavan, Director, Rain Centre, Chennai.