Agriculture Maharashtra

Bt-ing the farmers!

As the fresh sowing season starts, beleaguered cotton farmers, already steeped in debt, are being forced to opt for the more-expensive Bt (genetically modified) cotton. Inputs dealers in Vidarbha say that there is hardly any non-Bt hybrid variety available in the market this year. Jaideep Hardikar reports.

Nagpur - When the Prime Minister Dr Manmohan Singh visited Vidarbha last July, the Vidarbha farmers hoped bad days were coming to end, their destiny would change. Skeptics had warned the region’s agrarian economy, which has collapsed totally, could not be resurrected with piecemeal packages. They were right. The relief is turning out to be a mere band-aid, as it indeed was meant, with policies remaining unchanged on all fronts – credit, seeds, prices and imports, to name a few.

But, as the fresh sowing season starts, worrying signs are already evident. Beleaguered cotton farmers, already steeped in debt, have little choice but to opt for the more-expensive Bt (genetically modified) cotton this season.

Inputs dealers say that there is hardly any hybrid variety available in the market this year. “We get good margins on Bt from the companies. Also, the companies haven’t marketed hybrids this time around.” To be frank, says one dealer, “we are not keeping non-Bt seed, for it has no future.”

Pic: Jaideep Hardikar.

Estimates indicate entire cotton area to be under Bt, results of which have been very discouraging for the rain-fed region. Divisional Commissioner (Amravati) Sudhir Goyal says this year would be a 100 per cent Bt year. Meaning, nearly a 100 per cent cotton area would be occupied by Bt cotton.

While cotton prices are crashing every year, a total shift to the genetic modified cotton will hike up production costs, leading to a steep risk of heavier losses, farm activists say. The central problem is that India provides no cushion to millions of farmers from the risks involved. When hybrid seeds were introduced, they wiped out desi cotton. Now Bt cotton would wipe out hybrids and farmers would be left with no choice but to buy expensive Bt seeds.

The top scientists at the Central Institute of Cotton Research (CICR) fear it is a signal for disaster, which will be accentuated many times if monsoon fails. For one, only three-per-cent cotton area in Vidarbha has protected irrigation. Two, Bt cotton is highly capital intensive. In a region where income levels of farmers have been steadily dwindling, any exposure to risk could be suicidal. The chief minister, who is advocating that farmers practice yoga and spiritualism, could do well to regulate markets and ensure fairplay by the seed companies.

After Bollguard-I (first generation Bt), Monsanto has introduced in the market Bollguard-II in more or less the same genotypes (varieties). The price of a 450-gm packet of seed is Rs.1350, several times the cost of non-Bt seeds. A package of Bollguard-I comes at Rs.750. A packet of same quantity of non-Bt will come at Rs.400-450, while the desi cottonseed, grown in very few areas, costs Rs.50 a kg.

Farmers’ leader Vijay Jawandhia argues, “Bt cotton has not brought about any increase in productivity. Also, it has not reduced the use of chemicals.” Last year, with 60 per cent area under Bt, the production of cotton in the state could only match the average annual production – about 190 lakh quintals.

The Maharashtra Agriculture Minister, Balasaheb Thorat, recently admitted that Bt had failed in Vidarbha and cautioned farmers not to sow it.

Flaky results, pre-determined consensus

Maharashtra’s fading bumper crop

State government reports and statistics too suggest that Bt cotton has not brought about any rise in productivity or decline in pesticide use. In 2005, Maharashtra’s Agriculture Commissioner wrote in his note to the central government and later the National Commission of Farmers about the poor performance of Bt in the state. Also, Maharashtra government has in four years paid to farmers about Rs.400 crore in compensation due to the failure of Bt cotton in Vidarbha and other parts.

Suman Sahai, Convenor of Gene Campaign, New Delhi, says: “The only long term feasible and sustainable approach to controlling pests in cotton would be not the Bt gene but a long term integrated pest management approach.”

An estimate suggests that over 30 lakh packets of Bt cottonseeds would be sold this season, enough to cover well over ten lakh hectare farms in the region. That’s more than a double-fold rise in the acreage over last year, officials point out. A disaster of unmanageable proportions is on the cards if there is any fluctuation in monsoon, fears Kishor Tiwari of the Vidarbha Jan Andolan Samiti. So far, rains haven’t betrayed the farmers, but as the entire Vidarbha reels under inclement weather, some areas are staring at first sowing being washed away.

Already, the farm suicides in 2007 are nearing 500. Tiwari laments that a cotton farmer commits suicide every six hours in Vidarbha, and the rate has been picking up alarmingly, pooh-poohing the government claims that the suicides in Vidarbha have declined due to the implementation of special relief packages.

Interestingly, the Maharashtra Agriculture Minister, Balasaheb Thorat, recently admitted that Bt had failed in Vidarbha and cautioned farmers not to sow it. “We will introduce new crop patterns for every district in the entire state,” Thorat said after a Kharif review meeting in Nagpur earlier in May. “We want Vidarbha farmers to shift to soybean,” the minister proposed, “because the prices are good and cultivation is cheaper.” But it’s too late, and the damage is done.

Also, farm activists point out the government-run Mahabeej seeds corporation is itself marketing Bt cottonseeds to inputs dealers, while the minister advises caution. There is a lot of double-speak on the part of the government, charges Tiwari.

Yet, what’s concerning activists is the permission granted to nearly 53 new genotypes of Bt cotton by the Genetic Engineering Approval Committee (GEAC). As many as 35 of those varieties would be introduced in the central India.

Over 60 Bt varieties are already in the market here and few more are on the anvil. But there’s hardly any study on the performance of new genotypes in Vidarbha. “We don’t yet know whether these varieties will suit the agro-climatic and soil conditions; moreover releasing the second generation Bt (Bollguard II) for a wide spread commercial use is surely disastrous,” says a senior CICR scientist, speaking under condition of anonymity. He also warns that it is only a matter of time before the widespread emergence of resistance in bollworms. “It has already happened in Gujarat, where bollworms have developed resistance to Bt.”

Peasants’ confusion is only being compounded by the introduction of new varieties this season. As companies compete for greater market share, they are promoting their brands fiercely and relentlessly, and farmers are being exposed to greater risks.

Filed under

Agriculture Maharashtra

Cite this article

Jaideep Hardikar (2007) ‘Bt-ing the farmers!’, India Together, 2 July 2007. https://indiatogether.org/btvidarb-agriculture/

4 reader responses

Add a response

An editor reads every response before it appears. Links are not published, and no email address is asked for or stored.

  1. Anantdeep Singh · 25 July 2007

    Sir, The scenario is positive but see the menance of mango mealy bug as it has attacked and destroyed in hundreds of acres. The most loss has been caused to the BT-cottton and there is no insecticide that is effective, now what will the BT gene do in this case. A hype has been created about BT cotton, without going in for long term testing and validation before release of varieties.

  2. rajesh timane · 16 September 2007

    the problem of non-hybrid seeds can be taken care of by private seed banks. many ngo's run such type of seed banks wherein the farmers get the seeds free of cost in lieu of a promise that they will return it back on harvesting in at least equal proportion. i've seen this with a ngo working in rural areas in daryapur district, banglore, amravati... there must have been many more such seed banks thus.

  3. nitin patil · 15 May 2008

    Dear jaideep, I am Agri graduate and doing farming in Vidarbha. I want know one thing how many Bt farmers your visited. Bt is very good technology and it is really helpful to farmers. you mention that no increase in cotton yield in 2005. this is because of reduction in cotton area not because of bt.cotton. you are journalist you should go to base of the problem not to give opinion of few flop scientist and few leaders who are intrested in their vote bank. if go to mr. tiwary, javandiya and parakh pohares farm house you will find all these so called activist using BT cotton.

  4. Jaideep Hardikar · 21 May 2008

    Mr Patil, "I respect your view on Bt technology. I think in the entire article, I haven't passed any comment; just placed the facts and views of various scientific organisations. The country's foremore scientist and father of the green revolution, Professor M S Swaminathan, has also cautioned governments of genetic technology's effects on Vidarbha farmers in particular. In 2005 he had pitched for making Vidarbha an "organic agri-zone." This is apart from a number of government and non-government, scientific and farmers' lobbies warning farmers against the use of a costly technology. With regard to the reduction in cotton produce, there's a comprehensive report that Sudhir Goyal had submitted to the Centre on performance of Bt cotton in Maharashtra (2005) when he was commissioner agriculture, Pune. For your information, 27 lakh of the 36 lakh farmers in Vidarbha now earn less than Rs 10,000 annually, irrespective of their land holdings, according to a report of the state planning board. and a majority of them are from western Vidarbha. The CAG found in its performance audit of farmers' package that the return on investment in cotton in Vidarbha is minus 2 per cent. And this is in Bt cotton area. There of course are a few exceptions, understandably, like you. I would like you to enlighten me: Could and should a 5-acre farmer sow costlier Bt seeds when he has no irrigation, no access to credit and no collective-strength to sell his produce? And this, when the agriculture extension of the university perhaps you studied in collapsed a long ago? And this, when volatility in cotton prices is beyond his comprehension? As far as I understand, Bt technology can't and doesn't improve the yields, but is designed to take care of the pest attacks; in the current case, Bollworm. The very propaganda that it helps improve the yields is misleading and erroneous, to say the least. When it comes from agriculture graduates like you hailing from Vidarbha, it's all the more surprising and shocking! Vidarbha's problem remains non-existence of a long-staple, drought-prone variety, if I am not wrong in understanding. At least that's what I gathered after attending seminars. The recent research also shows us that Bt cotton doesn't counter Mealy Bug, a new pest in Indian subcontinent that has devoured huge swathes of cotton crop in Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh and Punjab. You may visit CICR to find out more about it, if you care! With regard to your question as to how many farmers I've visited, I can't remember how many I did since 1997-98 when I began reporting on the issue. However, I have visited not less than 350 farm households where their breadwinners and near and dear ones ended themselves. Post 2004, almost all of them had sowed Bt seeds (and I've prepared a comprehensive data-bank on that), costlier than they could afford. You are an Agriculture Graduate, which is, I believe, an advantage. Which a marginal farmer in trouble neither enjoys becoming one, nor covets. For it takes far more money to take education than a poor farmer in Vidarbha can actually afford today. Farmers' crisis goes beyond agriculture or Bt technology, if you read some of my other stories suggest. But post 2004, costly Bt technology has added a burden on already indebted farmers. In a family you decide your priorities based on your income and affordability. However, if you have no choice in the inputs market but to sow Bt, I think it's an issue a journalist must write or point out. That's the least I have been trying to do for the past decade or so! I thank for your suggestion that I must, as a journalist, try to go to "base problems." Well, that's what I am attempting to do. That, you'll appreciate, remains my pursuit. Jaideep Hardikar