Whose Gujarat?
The violent assertiveness against Aamir Khan is part of a larger trend, marked by politicians who have instilled the language with idioms of aggression. But as they mobilise to silence the 'other' voices in the Narmada struggle, 'we' lose too, for it is only a short step from here to gagging ourselves, says Himanshu Upadhyaya.
From March 08 onwards – when the Narmada Control Authority took the controversial decision to raise the height of Sardar Sarovar Dam on the Narmada river in Gujarat – we have witnessed a steady rise of not merely the dam wall itself, but also the frenzy exhibited by supporters of the dam. The recent episode is the anger displayed by activists of Bharatiya Janta Party’s (BJP) youth wing, first by stopping the screening of the film Rang de Basanti from cinemas in Gujarat, and now threatening violence if any cinema hall dare release the latest Aamir Khan starrer, Fanaa.
Let us look at how this came about. Dismayed at the extreme indifference shown by the ruling government to their pleadings for halting the construction of the dam until affected persons are properly rehabilitated, Medha Patkar, Jamsingh Nargave and Bhagvatiben Jatpuriya went on indefinite fast from March 29th at Jantar Mantar in New Delhi. Aamir Khan met these Narmada protestors, as well as others protesting the continuing neglect of victims of the Bhopal gas tragedy more than 20 years ago, and spoke about the apathy of the state towards obtaining justice for these vulnerable communities. Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi’s admirers from the BJP’s youth wing were so enraged by this show of support that they spent no time labeling him as enemy of Gujarat. They hit the streets burning his posters soon after, while carefully sparing the TV sets in their own homes that took his sound bytes and image to millions of others in Gujarat!
The BJP workers shouting at the top of their voices that Gujarat needs and benefits from the dam might find Aamir Khan’s appearance a useful lever for their spiral of increasing violence. But voices of Gujarat come in other forms too. These workers would do well to recall the lines penned by Gujarati poet Umashankar Joshi, on what will happen when the anger of the starving countryside engulfs the palaces.
*Bhukhya jano no jatharagni jaagshe
khandher ni bhasm kaNi na laadhashe*
(When the hunger of starving millions will engulf the sky,
How will you retrieve the burnt-out remnant of your palaces)
The violent assertiveness is part of a larger trend. In the last decade, Gujarat has witnessed the rise to power of those politicians who instilled the language with idioms of aggression. In the process, asmita (identity) is undergoing swift erosion by oft-repeated use and abuse in Gujarati writings and society. There is an urgent need to reclaim humility and reason, as the rising dam wall threatens to drown all reason.
Unsustainable ground water extraction practices - like the ones exhibited by soft drink giants (one of which is, ironically, endorsed by the same Aamir Khan in television commercials) defeat the hard work of activists who work on rejuvenation of rain water harvesting structures.
• Cavalier justice
As someone who was born and brought up in Saurashtra, I still vividly remember reading Jhaverchanda Meghani’s books on rebels. When I recall the description of Saurashtra’s landscape – and especially rivers, so vividly captured in short stories such as Ghodi ane Ghodesavar (The horse and rider) – I often wonder who we should blame for the death of those rivers. Can mindless attacks on Aamir Khan or Medha Patkar help us understand water scarcity, or find solutions for it? There is little thought given to this. Last week, I visited Saurashtra and shared my memories of Megahni’s accounts of rivers with my friend, who has worked on rejuvenation of local water sources. While he shared my views on the neglect of local water resources, and talked about his work on river revivals through check-dams, he appeared flowing with the official line when it came to blaming Medha.
It was also last week that my parents made me watch a documentary on floods in the river Navli – on whose banks I spent my childhood days – during the last monsoon. My maternal uncle and I recalled how, during 1982 the river similarly flooded, and our neighbours were in anguish over the fate of our river-bank colony, if the waters were to rise by a few metres more. My eyes fill with tears when I recall the image of my grandfather, who would come to the river with a stick in his hand, asking us kids to return home for lunch during those childhood days.
As I grew from childhood into my teens, the river gradually died. First it stopped flowing all around the year, and instead became a seasonal river. Its flow gradually trickled down, due to rampant extraction of groundwater along its banks. A small dam upstream from my childhood home, on a stream merging with the river, started recording less and less water storage. The final three years of the eighties were very bad. However, from late nineties, realisation dawned upon Gandhian social activists that much work needs to be done on rejuvenating local water resources, and dreams of getting water piped from far-away sources were wishful. Now, with a series of checkdams built along the course, this river witnessed a huge flood thanks to the bounties of last monsoon (and that’s why my parents made it a point to make me watch this documentary on last year’s flood).
With Aamir Khan categorical that there is no question of offering an apology for his stance, those BJP workers are now threatening to ban not only all the films of Aamir, but also the products that he endorses. Even Harin Pathak,senior BJP leader, says he shouldn’t have spoken without having thorough knowledge of the issue. But what about those who do have extensive knowledge of the project, and are still critical? What is the rioters’ response to critics of the project – amongst whom many do speak, understand and read Gujarati, though might not have penned articles in Gujarati – who have opposite view on the dam than that of the establishment.
Silencing the ‘other’ is only a short step away from silencing ourselves. What will happen if the fanatics of BJP youth wing were to snatch away my fellow Gujaratis’ right to a different voice, say, fiction written by Ashwini Bhatt, rather than Aamir Khan? How many of ‘us’ can we silence? I remember reading a letter from Bhatt, published in the Gujarati weekly Abhiyan more than a decade ago. He narrated his experience of being with the project oustees, and as he described the people he encountered I realised that they too - like the girl Luku who cooked makke ki roti for my favourite Gujarati fiction writer - were ‘our people’. My mind is gripped with fear as I recall this letter Ashwini wrote more than a decade ago, confessing that “Hafeshwar no khaDkaaL DhaaL utarataa utartaa huN radi padyo hato” (while climbing down the rocky slopes of Hafeshwar, my eyes were filled with tears).
Who are ‘we’? And which voices are ‘ours’?
*“KhetivaaDi dubaaDi ne, Gaamegaam ujaaDi ne
Banaavyo aa bandh tame, Dhokhaa dhaDi karine
Jivaadori tamaare, Faansi no fando amaare”*
By drowning our farmlands, and wiping out our villages
You have built this big dam by surreptitious means
Maybe it’s lifeline for you, but we will always call it death noose, and nothing else.
Filed under
Cite this article
Himanshu Upadhyaya (2006) ‘Whose Gujarat?’, India Together, 7 June 2006. https://indiatogether.org/gujarat-opinions/
5 reader responses
Add a response
Bhupi Patel · 7 June 2006
So Amir can speak his mind as his democratic right. Amir can speak for Bollywood. Amir can speak for displaced people. Amir can speak against anything. Amir can speak against anybody. Amir can speak for anybody. Amir and you can speak for Gujarat. But nobody else can speak against Amir, right? Nobody else can speak for Gujarat, right? Not even elected people of Gujarat can speak for Gujarat, right? Not even theater owners, video store owners, or their associations and unions have right to speak for themselves or right to reject Amir, right? We should meekly submit to blackmail of unelected, unaccountable, self-appointed activists and celebrities but people affected by them must not imitate their tactics, right? We should let them sabotage any project that could benefit large section of people on the ground that it may not benefit all equally, or that it might harm few, right? Thus let small adverse effects be propagandised and be used for blackmailing and stalling greater good, right? How come I don't have any sympathy for you or Amir?
Srinivas Savaram · 7 June 2006
This silencing of free speech and expression is a very dangerous trend developing across India with intolerance reaching unbearable levels. Picking on high profile targets like Ms. Khusboo and Mr. Aamir Khan might be yielding short term results, the long term portends disaster. Dissension and the right to hold and express alternative opinions are the cornerstone of a thriving democracy. Mr. Khan's unshakeable stand while speaking up for the displaced people is highly commendable and his stature in the eyes of the world has increased. He is a good role model to all, especially other public figures. Their selfless participation can turn the spotlight on issues that are important for the development of our nation. Banning of The Da Vinci Code movie in 5 states, harassing people celebrating Valentine's Day and banning of books in Maharashtra, imposing dress codes in Kashmir, violent protests against people advocating safe sex in Tamil Nadu and blanket vilification of dissenters in Gujarat, are all recipes for disaster.
Himanshu Upadhyaya · 8 June 2006
Dear Bhupi, Everyone can speak his/her own mind, but we can't speak under duress. Neither can I make Bhupi sympathise with my writings or Aamir's opinion, (as they say it in Gujarati "tame fakt ghoDaa ne paaNi pivaa taLaave lai jai shako) nor can Bhupi Patel make me write the way she/he expects. Whom shall one speak for/against is one's political choice, and Bhupi Patel can exercise the one as per his/ her political convictions. Now, let me quickly add that at times speaking for a community X doesn't translate into speaking against community Y, as it has been made out in the present case by terming Aamir's pronounciation as "for displaced people/Bollywood and against Gujarat" - at least by the likes of Amit Thaker. To come back to the central question that the title of the article has tried to focus on, who and all shall speak for Gujarat and claim the voice, the sign, the language - Gujarati - that one has acquired, society and the culture? Bhupi, can we limit this claim to a few politicians only? My answer would be that let their be five crore voices, let their be five crore thoughts. Again, don't think that by writing this article I was pleading for sympathising with my writings and granting me spokepersonship for Gujarat and Gujaratis. I can only claim to speak my own mind and claim to speak only on my behalf, no one else, but still I can ask the question that has been asked in the title. And for doing so if these community/society that you call Gujarati wants to deny me "membership", so be it. Bhupi, your last few lines have words like "any project that could benefit large section of people" and "it may harm few" as well as "small adverse effects". I can't direct you, but I think that I can certainly request you to do a rethinking over the words, "large sections of people" as community that benefits and "few" as the ones who suffer as well as the adjective "small" for adverse effects. And, Bhupi it will help us all understand what is at the heart of the debate over Narmada, if we answer these questions that can be asked even in General Studies paper of UPSC 1, How many rivers are there in Gujarat and on how many of them government has built bg dams? 2, How many dams are there in Gujarat and what has been their role in solving the water scarcity in Gujarat? 3, How many dams are there where the dam wall is finished but canals network is non existent, making it impossible to irrigate the land? 4, How many families in Gujarat have been displaced due to the Sardar Sarovar dam over the river Narmada?
Vispi Jokhi · 28 June 2006
We are very quick in forming opinions based on info fed to us by the media. It is responsible publishers like India Together that help ferret out the truth. Every citizen has a right to voice an opinion and it is the resposibility of persons in the public eye to speak up for the voices which are drowned by the media. These utterances must be based of facts and as close to the truth as possible. I request the author to educate the public about the facts in this case. Amir has been consistent and well informed in this matter and should be supported but more important is the isuue of obtaining justice for the project affected in the Narmada valley.
Indian · 26 August 2006
Very few people can practice what they preach. It is surprising to see that in real life also Amir Khan is trying to relive one of his bollywood characters. God bless Amir.