In Kurukshetra, a new victory
The villages of Khanpur Kholiya, Masana and Sawla in Haryana have received the central government's Nirmal Gram Puruskar for ensuring that no one, not even a child, defecates in the open. Darryl D'Monte reports.
The great battle of Indian mythology was fought here, but these days Kurukshetra is home to a more mundane combat - with deadly disease-inducing social and personal habits. In several villages in the district, there has been tremendous progress in sanitation. The village of Khanpur Kholiya, along with Masana and Sawla, has received the central government’s Nirmal Gram Puruskar for ensuring that no one, not even a child, defecates in the open.
In South Asia, which has more people affected by poor sanitation than any other region of the world, as many as 1 million children under five years old die every year, many of them due to water-borne diseases linked to poor sanitation and hygiene. In India, 30 million in rural areas suffer every year from sanitation-related illnesses.
Why? Poor sanitation immediately conjures up images of poverty, but the reverse isn’t always true. The South Asian office of the Water & Sanitation Programme (WSP) of the World Bank has often cited the paradox that good sanitation isn’t necessarily related to income levels. Kerala, where per capita incomes are modest, has scored spectacularly on this front. And richer people sometimes are slow to shrug off poor past practices - WSP experts recalled a well-off Haryana farmer who proudly told them how he makes it a point to take his entire family out first thing in the morning in his Maruti - to the fields to perform their ablutions!
The current year, 2008, is the International Year of Sanitation. And SACOSAN 3, the third bi-annual South Asian Conference on Sanitation, will be held in Delhi from 16-21 November this year. As part of a media conclave prior to the conference, journalists from India and Pakistan - Bangladeshis weren’t given visas in time - accompanied WSP experts and others to Khanpur Kholiya.
The visitors were heralded by a rustic band and the walls of the houses along the tiny lanes carried slogans like Swachha gav, swastha gav (A clean village is a healthy village). Once seated, in the spacious terrace of the well-appointed panchayat headquarters, the visitors were festooned with iridescent turbans or shawls. Jaswinder Kaur, the feisty sarpanch of the village and Surjit Kaur, the Mahila Mandal Pradhan, recounted how they had armed themselves for the battle against unhygienic practices. They recalled that the social awareness had been kindled through a movement to rid the men folk of the scourge of alcoholism. “Today my village is a clean village,” asserted Surjit Kaur proudly. “All the women are with me.”
Experts resort to the ungainly acronym ODF to designate a village as being ‘open-defecation’ free. Haryana has a long way to go by this measure, but this is not because the state is poor. The elected officials we spoke to pointed out that per-capita income in Haryana is among the highest for Indian states; the state attracts very high levels of investment in emerging industry sectors. Thus, it’s not poverty that is keeping sanitation at bay. Rather, it is people’s attitudes, which prevent them from realising the importance of good practices. Haryana could consider itself truly emancipated when its ODF-rank too becomes high.

The progress of the award-winning villages has been achieved through tremendous social mobilisation, largely through the perseverance of women. Women and children act as vigilantes, armed with lathis and torches, to enforce this diktat at dawn and dusk. We asked if anyone had refused to build a toilet inside his or her home. The women admitted that there were those who didn’t have funds to construct their own toilet. The O P Jindal Grameen Jan Kalyan Sansthan, the philanthropic foundation set up by the steel magnate’s family, provided funding to support the sanitation scheme. The toilets cost less than Rs.1000-1200. The Mahila Mandal served as a cooperative to extend loans.
There were others who didn’t have the space to construct their own toilet. And for them - typically in clusters of four families - the panchayat provided the space. These were pour-water latrines, where one pit would serve a family of five for two years. The panchayat also decided not to create community toilets; Surjit Kaur says in the past this has been “not a very good experience” - presumably because of the lack of ‘ownership’ of such facilities, no one maintained them properly.
More than the actual number of toilets that needed to be built, it was important to imbibe the realisation of the need to build them. Initially, the men weren’t motivated because they didn’t suffer the same level of indignity as women in having to relieve themselves in the open. A Block Development Officer recounted how he had learned the importance of sanitation from his own experience in participating in the campaign. There were still 18 or 19 villages in the block where there were no toilets. Women had to wait for dawn or dusk to ease themselves.
The entry point of the campaign was the Community-Led Total Sanitation approach designed by experts. Briefly, the motivators ask villagers to draw an outline of their village with a stick on the mud, which begins as a fun exercise. Each is then asked to locate her house with white powder, leading to more merriment on the part of these barefoot cartographers. But then comes the whammy: they are asked to identify where they and their children defecate by placing a handful of turmeric powder on the spot, which leads to considerable consternation and shame. As a further exercise, a mother is asked where a child with diarrhoea will relieve himself or herself; this is obviously closer to habitation.
The motivators then take a pinch of the powder, empty it into a glass of water and ask who in the village would sip it. Obviously, no one volunteers, and the motivators point out that this is precisely what is happening, right under the villagers’ noses, day in and day out, with disastrous consequences to child mortality and community health in general.
The area has other signs of hope. During a recent visit to a village in Kurukshetra to see the progress that has been achieved first-hand, I could not but marvel at the evident all-round prosperity. There were none of the tell-tale indices that bedevil other rural areas - broken down homes, half-clad and pot-bellied children, crippled with anaemia, and the like. Instead, there were pukka homes - some two-storeyed - and a few with cars and many more cycles. Tractors were still more abundant.
Jasbir Kaur, the sarpanch of Masana village, told visitors how she had use the analogy of flies to drive home the significance of sanitation. These pesky vectors couldn’t discriminate between a latrine and food or utensils, and spread disease prolifically. Careless sanitation achieved much of the same unintended adverse health impact.
Media exposure - the local Kurukshetra newspaper front-paged our visit the following day - had helped considerably in the exposure to the problem and its solutions. But everyone in the village also cited the Nirmal Gram Puruskars, where no less than the President awarded the annual prizes to panchayat heads who had rid their village of open defecation. The women are careful that they should not merely rest on the laurels, however; Jasbir Kaur asserted the importance of maintaining toilets properly, lest people slip back into old practices - somewhat like the achievement of full literacy in Kerala.
In Masana, the panchayats hired women to maintain the toilets, who were paid Rs.3500 a month - an unimaginably high figure by standards of the average village in this country. It was a matter of community shame, she said, that Kurukshetra recorded a gender ratio of only 835 women for every thousand men, which obviously indicated widespread female infanticide. This had also motivated women to emancipate themselves, so as to check social imbalances, which created the right environment for a sanitation drive.
Toilets in schools had also led to a fall in the drop-out rate. Women’s self-help groups had distributed cottage-made sanitary napkins to girls to inculcate hygiene, which was an equally important component of the programme. In Masan, there was an incinerator for proper disposal of these napkins. A napkin cost 80 paise, the cheapest possible, without compromising on quality.
The Kurukshetra success couldn’t have been possible without the die-hard dynamo in the shape of Sumedha Kataria, the Additional District Collector, who took firm charge of us visitors, right up to the time we had completed a tour of the mythological sites in the town late in the evening. She stressed the role of teachers as agents of change and had addressed children herself, who were very receptive. Teachers had volunteered to spend time beyond their school duty hours on the campaign. Children had stickers with some five slogans on their notebooks, which served as constant reminders of the message. Villages carried slogans like “My daughter will only get married to a family where there is a toilet”.
She also acknowledged the positive role played by the media, which had reported how she had once visited a village at 5 AM. The drive for total sanitation was a little like a ‘maha-yudh’, she said, candidly. Like in any battle, it is difficult to maintain the level of enthusiasm and the morale of the ‘troops’. She is motivating banks to provide loans to construct houses along with toilets.
Kataria detailed the verification process of selecting Nirmal Gram Puruskars. A team with some 40-50 people would visit a panchayat and inspect it. This would be followed up by a smaller team, which would visit unannounced and make a final selection. Asked whether such campaigns depend, crucially, on charismatic and articulate leaders like herself, Kataria replied that it was indeed a matter of personal conviction. “A lot depends on leadership,” she admitted. “I have grown through the Total Sanitation Campaign and grown with it, spiritually and emotionally. The show must go on.”
Filed under
Cite this article
Darryl D'Monte (2008) ‘In Kurukshetra, a new victory’, India Together, 4 November 2008. https://indiatogether.org/kuru-health/
5 reader responses
Add a response
Vivek · 6 November 2008
This has been excellent. Can we take up these bright implementation ideas and implement in other villages of Haryana at first step. How do you see integration among various villages w.r.t to good practices are concerned.
D N Sharma · 8 November 2008
It is motivating example for other villages! Also, it is the joint courage of WOMEN! GREAT!!!
Dick de Jong · 16 November 2008
Great story by Darryl! Again it are women taking the lead on social mobilzation for sanitation. In many cultures women have a direct interest in decent toilets. But it is unclear how hygienic the improved latrines really are, anf if the inceidence of diarrhoea will go down. Dick de Jong (Netherlands)
Prakash M Apte · 16 November 2008
Implanting Urban 'Sanitation' in our rural areas: Before embarking upon and going headlong into implanting urban sanitation systems in our rural areas, our decision makers could pause and ponder upon a few facts. Is there any conclusive evidence to establish a direct cause and effect relationship between the practice of 'defecation' in the open fields and spread of diseases? What is 'poor sanitation'? Is'nt it a relative concept? for urbanites having water carriage system toilets attached to their bedrooms, even a 'pit privy' located away from the house could be 'poor sanitation'! The proud Haryana farmer who takes his entire family out to field every morning (referred to sarcastically in the article) in his Maruti for their daily ablution is in fact being far more environment friendly, green and contributing to cost saving in infrastructure systems than the self proclaimed a environmentalists! How does 'defecating' in open fields make the village 'aswachha' (unclean)? It in fact returns the nutrients to earth, saves on man made fertilizers, uses the sun's free energy to convert solid waste into manure; all the objectives so vociferously propounded from national and international platforms by the self proclaimed experts! Alas, had the social mobilization achieved to make the rich Haryanvi villager build a water borne toilet (at a capital cost to him and heavy revenue expenditure to local panchayat, with problems of mass disposal of human excreta,) been directed to educate women against the practice of female infanticide that has put Haryana at the top of the states with lowest female to male child ratio; it would have been a far greater contribution to the health of the state and the nation! What is the 'indignity' in going to open fields? It is common sight while traveling in Rajasthan to find women with veils over their faces 'defecating' -as we urbanites like to describe the natural act of ablution. But, as one of the women unashamedly explained, human bodies are same all over the world, till one can attach a face to it! Has the media really played a positive role or has inadvertently introduced 'westernized' ideas of what is 'sanitary' into an ongoing, perfectly natural recycling process of human waste conversion into fertilizer at no cost? The real fact is, 'the show must go on, for the misguided environmentalists, officials, builders and material suppliers, politicians, international institutions offering credit lest it is proved some day that the age old wisdom of the populace is superior to that of the 'blinkered' experts! It is said of US President Lincoln that by surrounding himself by people who bring different perspectives, he will increase his options, absorb dissenting views.... . One wishes our decision makers have the inclination and the intellect to understand this. Prakash M Apte Urban DevelopmentConsultant 16th November 2008
prince kadyan · 17 November 2008
yes what mr. apte said is partially right. as my being from a small village in haryana i can bring the true picture. its right that nutrients are added to the ground. moreover going far away in fields also refreshes a person and serves asa form of exercise. but this is not always the case. what happens most of the time that the fields are not free crops are being sown in there, and people have to defecate on roadside itself which pollutes the environment only and spreads the diseases there is one more demerit that it bring insecurity to women. women who go to defecate in open are prey to eve teasin. it may be easy for men to sit anywhere and defecate but for women they need to search for a secure place and until then they have to resist the call of nature. regarding the cost,cost incurred on makin a toilet is very nominal around 5 to 6 thousand ,as compared to money spent by poor villagers on health issues in private hospitals, dowry and marriage parties etc.in a village a person will have everything from tv,refrigerator to a car but not a toilet to defecate. dont go far even in my house also there is not any toilet PRINCE KADYAN 3rd year BITS PILANI