Environment Health Maharashtra

No to noise

The courts and the police have cracked down on intense noise from motorists' honking in Mumbai's traffic, and the city has recently declared a big chunk of its territory off-limits to road noise. Darryl D'Monte reports.

Mumbai appears to stealing the thunder over other cities in cracking down on noise pollution, thanks in no small measure to the indefatigable efforts over six long years of Sumaira Abdulali, who runs the Awaaz Foundation. In February, the city designated as many as 1113 silent zones where honking is prohibited. About a fifth of these are in the commercial district of south Mumbai itself, which is most congested during the day. The World Bank recently declared that Mumbai is now the most crowded city in the world. Indeed, as much as 40 per cent of Greater Mumbai, which covers some 438 sq km, will be covered by the law.

In the last two months, without making too much of a noise about it, the traffic police have silently booked as many as 36,000 drivers, which means that they have got into the act without waiting for the silent zones to be declared. Offenders can be fine Rs.1000 and their licenses temporarily confiscated. Some 983 drivers have also been fined for using noisy or musical reverse horns, which are also banned, unknown to many users. The police have earned a windfall of Rs.42 lakhs in the crackdown, which only goes to show that anyone who has the will can do wonders. This should make a case for the department to hire more traffic cops, who will penalise motorists for parking offences as well. The fines alone should pay for their keep!

In Mumbai, Harish Baijal, Deputy Commissioner of Police in charge of Traffic, has been most proactive and working closely with the Awaaz Foundation, in sharp contrast to other official agencies. On 7 April last year, he designated a No Honking Day, with the help of many citizens’ organisations. It had very limited impact; many citizens went about the day as if were like any other, but it set the ball rolling: old habits die hard. What is more, although relegated to a single day, the drive and education campaign lasted for the next three months.

The current crackdown is by no means restricted to the silent zones. The police can penalise anyone honking too loudly and insistently anywhere, which has left some motorists puzzled. As is only too well established with other driving offences, any latitude on the part of the traffic policeman in interpreting rules leaves the door wide ajar for money to change hands. One motorist interviewed by a newspaper had the temerity to state that the first priority of the police was to regularise traffic, whatever he interpreted that as meaning. “If you want to drive in Mumbai, you have to honk,” he added for good measure.

This hits the nail on the head: motorists think they have the right to blow their horns; some might even think it is their duty, in order to avoid running into pedestrians or other vehicles. The damage that noise does, not least to hapless pedestrians and residents of arterial roads, is virtually ignored. Abdulali, in her writ petition before the Bombay High Court in 2007 notes: “The Petitioners state that Respondent No.1 [the Maharashtra government; others are the police and Transport Commissioner] has been charged with a statutory duty under the Noise Rules to ensure that noise levels are kept within the prescribed limits. However traffic noise in Mumbai and in all large cities in the state has reached alarming levels, much beyond the limits prescribed under the Noise Rules and the measures taken by the Respondents, if any, are wholly inadequate. Mumbai is said to be the third noisiest city in the world. The ill effects of noise are well established but however not known to most people as they are not immediately visible or discernible. The Petitioners seek directions from this Court for the strict implementation of the provisions of the Noise Rules and other statutory enactments…”

The current crackdown is by no means restricted to the silent zones. The police can penalise anyone honking too loudly and insistently anywhere.

Noise pollution and the law

Festival of noise

The court finally passed an order on 26 February earmarking the silent zones, which the municipal corporation has promptly put into effect. It is bound to have a salutary effect on drivers - particularly of the older, decrepit taxis and auto rickshaws - who will for the first time after several years be reminded that honking is an offence around schools and hospitals. In time, this will hopefully educate all drivers that the horn is a device to be used only in an emergency, and not as a method to alert others of one’s impending arrival.

Health effects

Hardly anyone is aware of the health impacts of excessive noise. In an interview last November, the well-known Mumbai-based health activist Dr R K Anand (one of his earliest campaigns was to promote breast-feeding and discourage infant foods in the country) recounts going to a birthday party at a restaurant for a five-year-old and finding that fathers found it impossible to speak to each other because the music was turned on far too loud. I can cite a different experience from my own son’s wedding some 15 months ago. I had grave misgivings that the reception would be a crashing bore because my son had banned all forms of music (or any amplification, for that matter!). However, in the end, everyone complimented us for being able to meet friends and actually talk to them, for a change.

As Dr Anand states, “It is little known that continuous exposure to such settings can cause temporary or permanent deafness in children. Loss of hearing due to extreme noise is well established. Young children and adults should know that if they cannot talk to a person two metres away, the background noise level is downright unsafe. This level of sound is not uncommon in birthday parties, dance floors and rock music shows. Noisy toys, certain fireworks, marriage bands and loud speakers during festivals only make it worse.

“The ear does not distinguish between different types of noise. All noise exposure is addictive. Sumaira Abdulali is very concerned about this issue. She studies the level of noise with a proper instrument. Sound exposure below 78 decibels (dB) is safe… Birthday parties using loud speakers often record unsafe noise levels. The levels during the final day of the Ganapati immersion varies from 90-100 dB. The noise levels increased through the use of loud speakers, especially when powered with generators, film music, bands and firecrackers. Children often participated in these processions. Some mothers had crying infants in their arms. Noise from most ‘light based’ crackers, used during processions and Diwali exceed 100 dB.

“Sound exposure above 78 dB should alert us to possible danger. Sounds above 85 dB may cause temporary hearing loss, as after one rock show or a birthday party, but the loss may worsen and become permanent with frequent exposure to noise. Sudden extreme noise of more than 140 dB due to a bomb or other source can cause permanent loss of hearing even after one exposure. Of course, there is a known individual variation in susceptibility to hearing loss induced by noise.”

What Dr Anand doesn’t add is the stress on the nerves which constant honking causes. When Mumbai autos went off the roads some weeks ago over some dispute, the silence on the city’s streets was palpable (the noise caused by their engines is of course a much bigger contributory factor). While Bajaj and other two- and three-wheeler manufacturers have been pilloried for delaying the introduction of four-stroke engines and poisoning the atmosphere as a consequence, they have been let off the hook so far as their din is concerned. The ill-effects of air pollution or excessive heat or poor sanitation have been computed, but the full health and economic costs of stress due to noise haven’t. We have become inured to this level of nuisance and take it for granted, so much so that when one goes to the West, one wonders whether there is a curfew in place or another ban on vehicles.

In her petition Abdulali cited the international norms: “The World Heath Organisation in its Report published in 1995 prescribes a safe noise level for a city as 50 dB. For the purpose of illustration, the sound of a bird chirping generates a reading on the sound meter of about 20 dB while the sound of an aeroplane is at about 130 dB. While the threshold of hearing is anything above 0 dB, the threshold of pain is at about 120 dB. While most people are familiar with the notion of loud noise causing harm, not many are aware that continuous exposure to low levels of noise over a period of time can also cause loss of hearing.”

While enacting and enforcing laws is one part of the solution, education is surely another. Children, who now have to study the environment as part of their main curricula, ought to learn about the impact of noise on their well being and that of others. Consider that only 4 per cent of Mumbai’s commuters - as distinct from the total population of 16 million - use private cars and another use 9 per cent taxis and autos, this minority of 13 per cent imposes a very heavy (dare one say deafening?) burden on pedestrians and residents. Needless to add, the longer-term solution is to encourage public transport and deter motorised transport of all kinds, not least because of the very harmful impact on the climate.

Filed under

Environment Health Transport Urban Environment Maharashtra

Cite this article

Darryl D'Monte (2009) ‘No to noise’, India Together, 20 March 2009. https://indiatogether.org/noise-environment/

3 reader responses

Add a response

An editor reads every response before it appears. Links are not published, and no email address is asked for or stored.

  1. Roshan Shroff · 3 April 2009

    It is a welcome step in the right direction. However, I find the city as noisy as ever. Motorists and two wheelers honk loud and long. I have to stress that the way the pedestrians stroll along with impunity in the path of cars causes even me, an avid supporter of anti-noise, to honk. And unfortunately, a small quick honk does not deter them, only a loud piercing honk makes them walk on the edge of the road. Discipline should be enforced for vehicles as well as pedestrians. I know there is a woeful lack of foothpahs in our city. Still, the pedestrian should walk as much as he can on the side of the road, and if possible, facing the oncoming traffic. A lot of work needs to be done by our traffic police to make this happen. Publicity should be given to traffic discipline, aimed at vehicles drivers and pedestrians.

  2. Cor van de Water · 20 April 2009

    Of course the noise levels in the city are excessive, dangerous to the health. I fully agree to a consistent enforcement of the laws on noise pollution. But the story also makes me think of a patient with a deep cut which is bleeding uncontrollably. Every time the patient drips blood on the carpet he receives a fine to make him stop soiling the carpet, but nothing is done to stop the bleeding. There is a reason why motorists honk. It is not just impatience. When the car in front of you straddles the two lanes so you cannot pass on either side, when the bus or car you try to pass can at any time turn into your lane, when slow traffic continues to drive in the right lane, when bikes and cars can suddenly pull from side streets into the road without looking, when everyone is jumping red lights, when pedestrians walk all over the road - in other words if nobody follows the rules of the road then there is a need to alert them to your presence to try and avoid an accident due to this neglect. And it has benefits, with a high powered air horn can a lorry driver convince a few more vehicles to give him space and he is not affected by the ear-shredding punishment that he inflicts on any pedestrians or residents that he wakes up from half a mile distance. It is also a matter of respect and awareness. When the neighbor across the street arrives home from work every 3 AM and the watchman is not at the gate, then he simply leans on his dual-tone horn until the gate is opened, no matter what that does to neighbors or the backup-alarm that he is sounding several times while parking his car. It will take a lot of educating to change this kind of behavior and make our environment more healthy. There are other things to address as well, such as the use of high beams in the city wihch blind oncoming traffic to the point that I narrowly escaped several crashes only due to being blinded by oncoming traffic. But the fact that half the vehicles have no lighting and pedestrians crossing at inappropriate times and without looking encourages the use of excessive light, also because it alerts other traffic of your presence in the same way as honking and the offender is not bothered by the oncoming driver's crashes after being blinded. Fact is that the total safety on the road diminishes by not following the rules, while some individuals with the best equipment will win. That is typical for the laws of the jungle - the strongest wins and the net result is chaos. It is the opposite of a civilised society and it shows in honesty the status, not politician's words. I fear we will need to see changes all the way from the top, the police no longer being corrupt but actually enforcing rules, a thorough driver education and re-education if found making too many errors (tickets) and road building that encourages pedestrians to walk on footpaths and clear lane indications for road traffic, and enforcement on vehicle lighting and noise levels - that would cause a drastic change, because now the patient's wound is treated instead of focussing on his dripping.

  3. charudatta Kasbe · 3 February 2012

    A car owner in my society has a reverse horn that has a disturbing sound i have complained to the traffic police they say they have fined him and have given me a letter under rti that i will have to make a police complaint for the same if it is to be stopped. Pl guide me.