Opinion Poverty Women Andhra Pradesh

No place for single women

Once, Andhra Pradesh's top leaders queued up at Bandi Lachmamma's home with promises. The debate on farm suicides hit the headlines when her husband took his life. Years later, she works as a coolie in Anantapur earning much less than the minimum assured by the NREGP - which turns away single women, writes P Sainath.

“They don’t want widows,” says Bandi Lachmamma. She’s speaking of the National Rural Employment Guarantee Programme. “I could not find work at those sites for more than a few days. After that, they turn you away if you are single, without a male partner.” And she’s speaking in Anantapur, Andhra Pradesh, where the NREGP - the nation’s flagship development project - was first launched. The programme itself has benefited lakhs of families in the State. But Lachmamma is among those who have lost out.

“She’s quite right about this,” says K.R. Venugopal, a former Secretary to the Prime Minister. “Others like her have had the same experience,” he told this correspondent from Hyderabad. Mr. Venugopal, who was also Special Rapporteur to the National Human Rights Commission, has recently done a study on the NREGP. “Single women do indeed lose out for the reasons she gives.” A woman who remains in her husband’s village after his death is often isolated there. It is not easy to find a male partner for work - something worksite officials demand.

Lachmamma is one of Anantapur’s most well known women. For all the wrong reasons. This is a district that shot to national notoriety for its flood of farmers’ suicides. And her husband’s was the first to capture media attention. When Bandi Narasimhalu killed himself almost seven years ago, it shook Andhra Pradesh and sparked debate on the agrarian crisis crippling the countryside.

“With all those leading figures coming here and making promises,” says Dr. M. Geyanand, a well-known doctor in Anantapur, “this is still how she ends up. Imagine how the others must be faring.”

Bureaucracy blocks benefits

Autonomous NREG agency needed

Narasimhalu, a groundnut farmer with five acres, cracked under a debt of Rs.2 lakh, crop failure, and cultivation costs. As his wife told us in that period: “He came home one day and took his life with the only thing the government had given him. Monocrotophos.” That pesticide was the one free input handed out to farmers in the State at the time. His death rocked the Andhra Pradesh Assembly. Political leaders queued up at Lachmamma’s doorstep in Chiyyedu village. The media descended on her in droves.

Today: “I try to run my farm. But just now I’m mostly working as a coolie in Anantapur town.” That is, for Rs.60 a day on a railway construction project handled by a private contractor. Of which Rs.10 “goes in paying for the auto.” The `auto’ is a euphemism for a seven-seat three-wheeler that actually stuffs in up to 20 human beings. She pays Rs.5 each way of the 18-kilometre journey.

“With all those leading figures coming here and making promises,” says Dr. M. Geyanand, a well-known doctor in Anantapur, “this is still how she ends up. Imagine how the others must be faring.” Lachmamma says “Y.S. Rajasekhara Reddy was one of those who came to my house.” He was then an Opposition leader. She accepts that because of his visit, the family got Rs.25,000 from the local Congress MLA. “But Rajasekhara Reddy said he would build me a home. With folded hands, he promised me a job. It did not happen. I have not seen him since,” she says, without bitterness, though.

The Rs.1 lakh compensation the Government gave the family has been steadily dwindling. At the farm, “the input costs keep going up and we lose money each season. We also have no cattle.” Because Narasimhalu sold off their cattle before he died. And because “a bullock we bought after his suicide also died.”

At the government work sites: “The field assistants and project officials prefer to deal with groups,” says Lachmamma. “If you do not have a male partner, they turn you away, assuming you cannot do real physical labour. They don’t want widows. They told me: `to benefit from this scheme, you must be at least a pair of workers.’ So I am forced to work as a coolie in Anantapur.” That, at much less than the minimum Rs.80 the NREGP would give her.

A new book Capturing Imagination of the Stakeholders also confirms her complaint. Written by Dr. S. Gopal, the book is based on field studies on the NREG Act in operation. It records that over 200 women in Borampalli village of Anantapur district said that “they were not being called for work at all.” It notes that this is because segments of the work are mostly taken up “by two or three families as a unit.” It found that since higher output was seen as “coming only by being family-centric, single-women have no place in the NREGA.”

So she wakes up at 5 each morning. After cooking, fetching water, washing, and other chores by 7 a.m. she heads for the `auto’ that takes her to Anantapur. Reaching there an hour later, she has a tiny meal she’s taken along. She starts work at 9 a.m. and is back home only 7 p.m. where she has to look after her son Gopal and her daughter’s son as well. Both stay with her. Gopal has just become a computer operator at a local bank but only on a casual basis. He will get Rs.1,500 a month as long as he is kept on. The three thus live on about Rs.100 a day “most of which goes in our basic expenses.”

“Remember that when the agricultural season comes along, we have to hire labourers at around Rs.100 per head - more than what we ourselves earn daily off-season. We spend around Rs.3,000 each season on labour.” But she hasn’t given up on the farm. She will cultivate it and “if there’s a decent crop, we can survive.”

Her big hope is that her 10-year-old grandchild, now in the 5th class, “will have a better life than us.” She has another son “who drives one of those `autos’ of the kind I travel by,” she laughs. But “our timings are very different,” so there are no free rides to Anantapur. “He lives separately with his own family now. They can barely support themselves. So how can he help us,” she says. So who can? “Maybe Rajasekhara Reddy. Now that he is Chief Minister, do you think might build us that house and give my son a job?”

Filed under

Poverty Women Andhra Pradesh

Cite this article

P Sainath (2007) ‘No place for single women’, India Together, 28 May 2007. https://indiatogether.org/nregs-op-ed/

6 reader responses

Add a response

An editor reads every response before it appears. Links are not published, and no email address is asked for or stored.

  1. Gargi Iyengar · 29 May 2007

    NREGA definitely loks great on papers and discussions in cosy rooms where the babu’s reside but I think it hasn’t really contributed in a big way to the economy.By promising job for a certain minimum wage for a certain no of days in a year does not mean the government has done its duty of employing people productively.The problem of widows and single women being left out aren’t stray incidents and exists in a sizeable proportion not captured wholly by the media I think one way to ensure laksmamma and many more of her ilk get employment ( atleast in the short term) is to make these onsite officials accountable to the village heads who must ensure that jobs are guaranted to many like her. Nothing comes free in this world is an old cliché but this is true in this case too.The wages being paid are the taxpayer’s money and granting free houses , TV’s subsidies will only work for the short term and if a long term planning needs to be done then approaches like NREGA needs to be crafted more skillfully such that once the period of employment expires these folks aren’t thrown out to fend for themselves

  2. Amrith Jogi · 7 June 2007

    The much boasted NREGA failed to make any impact. One must look into irregularities happening in Karnataka under this scheme. Whatever may be the claused to check irregularities in the scheme, the clever officials finding their own way to rob the beneficiaries. In many places works were done using machineries, but not through providing jobs to oppressed. They say 'right' labourers are not coming forward to work under this scheme. So they opt to machineries to reach the 'target'

  3. Amrith Jogi · 7 June 2007

    The much boasted NREGA failed to make any impact. One must look into irregularities happening in Karnataka under this scheme. Whatever may be the clauses to check irregularities in the scheme, the clever officials keep finding their own way to rob the beneficiaries. In many places works were done using machineries, but not through providing jobs to oppressed. They say 'right' labourers are not coming forward to work under this scheme. So they opt for machines to reach the 'target'.

  4. Venugopalan.K.M · 26 August 2007

    This article, apart from highlighting the specific failures of the much publicised NREGA,instantly captures the built-in gender bias toward single women entering labour market. This is how the State makes it mandatory for everyone to be attached to the institution of family for protection; man the bread winner is made the norm here and hence, poor and marginalized women are made victims of such policies despite the tall claims of welfare interventions.

  5. Marisha Fonseca · 12 September 2007

    The NREGP is actually promoting gender discrimination by failing to provide for single women. It is viewing women as dependents on men, and who cannot exist by themselves. As a result, this much-boasted of scheme is a blunder made by the government because it is reversing a lot of the work done in the field of emancipation of women.

  6. madan mohan · 11 February 2008

    in kurnool district of andhra pradesh this nregp is doing excellent job. the immediate result observed is considerable reduction in migration of labour for work(in adoni division).of course some problems are plagueing the programme,but ultimately the work is showing by govt to provide minimum wage to the unskilled rural adult is making him insured of minimum wage . even private contractors are now forced to give littile extra than the minimum wage offered by nrega.it is good for him.but the program should be demand driven. the work shold be given him when he comes to do. thanks to district administration.