Sex education and survival tools
The recent decisions of several state governments to ban sex education in all schools concern everyone, particularly women. In this age of the knowledge economy, we cannot believe that people's access to information on any subject, including matters relating to sex, can be controlled, says Kalpana Sharma.
Here is a simple exercise that mothers can try with their daughters. Get your daughter to lie on her back on a big piece of paper and draw an outline of her body. Then ask her to fill in the space by marking out all her organs. Nine times out of 10, even a girl going to a ‘good’ school will pause when it comes to the sexual organs. She will not know. Because she has never been taught properly where these are located and what they are.
Why does she need to know, people ask. Previous generations of women and men did not have such knowledge. So why does this generation need to be taught? The answer to that question is so obvious that it really does not need an answer. Today, girls have to be taught because they are more vulnerable than their mothers. They are encouraged to be out in the public space. They are made to believe that they can do anything with their lives. Yet they do not know enough about their bodies to understand how to protect themselves — from assault and disease. These are basic issues that boys and girls can be taught in a clear, clinical way in school. This is not pornography we are talking about. Sex should not be a dirty word. It is a ‘fact of life’, one that everyone has a right to know and understand.
By denying sex education, girls grow up being ashamed, confused and uninformed about themselves and their bodies. And are also rendered far more vulnerable.
• Sex education off the charts
• Interact: Sex education or not?
Therefore, the recent decision of the Maharashtra government, which follows in the footsteps of several other State governments including Madhya Pradesh, Kerala, Gujarat and Karnataka, to ban sex education in all schools, is an issue that concerns everyone, but particularly women.
Path-breaking book
One of the path-breaking books on women and health is Our Bodies Ourselves by the Boston Women’s Health Collective. First published in 1971 as a 193-page pamphlet titled ‘Women and their bodies’, it became a bestseller when published in 1973. With practically no publicity and virtually by word of mouth, it sold 2,50,000 copies. Since then it has sold over four million copies, been translated into 20 languages and has books based on its concept in another half a dozen languages.
What began as an informal collective of 12 women in 1969, the Boston Women’s Health Collective has now become a non-profit organisation called Our Bodies Ourselves. On their website - www.ourbodiesourselves.org - they explain, “We provide clear, evidence-based information about health, sexuality, and reproduction from a feminist and consumer perspective. We remain one of the few women’s health groups in the U.S. that doesn’t accept funds from pharmaceutical companies.” The entire book is available on the website.
Our Bodies Ourselves is not a sex education manual. As its title suggests, it addresses issues relating to women’s bodies and their related needs. The initial thrust of the group that wrote the book was to equip women to deal with the medical profession. How do you demystify medicine so that women do not lose control of their bodies, that they learn how to ask the right questions about medical interventions and drugs, that they learn enough to take preventive steps against disease? The group in fact called themselves ‘The Doctors’ Group’ in that initial period.
Over time it grew into a manual that addresses much more than just physiology or disease. It looks at sexuality, at the politics of health and medicine, at the problems of poverty and race as they affect women’s health, etc. It is written in such a simple and accessible style that anyone can follow it. This is the secret behind its success and the fact that women’s groups in so many countries around the world have either translated the original or adapted it. In India, Anveshi Research Centre for Women’s Studies in Hyderabad brought out Taking Charge of Our Bodies: A Health Handbook for Women in 2004 (published by Penguin). This is the English version of the Telugu book first published in 1991 titled A Hundred Thousand Questions about Women’s Health.
These books are important because they give women the tools to understand their own bodies. Yet, not everyone welcomes such books. In the U.S., for instance, Jerry Falwell of the Moral Majority attacked Our Bodies Ourselves in the 1980s, calling it “obscene trash”. In India, even textbooks on sex education are attacked as obscene and considered a threat to ‘Indian values’.
The need to be open
Instead of being open about these issues, in this country we would prefer young people not to know. So sex should not be talked about in school, we are told. And at home? As far as girls are concerned, the norm is to teach them through admonition. “Be careful”, “Look how you’re sitting”, “Is this the way to walk?”, “Behave yourself”, “Cover yourself”, “Don’t be so shameless!” — the list is endless. By being reprimanded, girls are supposed to learn how to protect themselves without ever knowing why or from what. As a result, they grow up being ashamed, confused and uninformed about themselves and their bodies. And are also rendered far more vulnerable.
In this age of globalisation and the knowledge economy, we cannot pull down the shutters and believe that people’s access to information on any subject, including matters relating to sex, can be controlled. Would it not be better to teach both boys and girls about these issues in an atmosphere that encourages them to ask questions and to clear their doubts? How can such knowledge be considered obscene or against ‘Indian values’?
Filed under
Cite this article
Kalpana Sharma (2007) ‘Sex education and survival tools’, India Together, 9 April 2007. https://indiatogether.org/survival-op-ed/
5 reader responses
Add a response
N Nair · 9 April 2007
The great Indian morality has put an end to yet another attempt at making our children less vulnerable to society's predators. Cant we give them at least this much knowledge?Do people think that they are not going to access such information else where? If empowering them means a loss of moral values,I think its high time we reviewed our morality for a change.
Julie Thekkudan · 11 April 2007
Let alone a young girl, if you ask an adult woman to draw her body and then point out her sexual organs, there would be a strong hesitation. Largely an outcome of social taboos(the fear of who would be the audience, the fear of being termed 'fast', the need and preference to cover up any sexual experience, the need to protect oneself against any sexual advances and the list could be endless), it is a myth that the teaching of sex in schools would break open the doors of rampant sexuality among adolescents. Sex has been around from the beginning of time and would continue to remain till the end of the world. With information technology booming every day, there are every possibilities that what adolescents want to know will be sought in a surreptitious way. And there is no finding out whether the information sought is the right kind of information. I also feel that the educationists and policy makers themselves are uncomfortable in approaching the subject with an open mind and rather than be open and direct about it would like to give to it an aura of sleaziness. I am sure that hundreds of women would could have utilised such information to protect themselves and make better informed choices in their lives. I also think that there are men who are scared to give this choice to women and unfortunately, the policy makers seem to belong to this group.
Bal Ram Singh · 18 April 2007
1.I am so surprised by the comments of many people who seems to have done no research to evaluate if sex education or even drug education programs already carried out in the Western world have made any significant positive impacts. See Health Education Research, Vol. 17, No. 4, 471-481, August 2002 to get some clues. There is no effective data to support the contention that these programs work. 2. Actually, children may harmed by some of these very well-meaning ideas. It has already been shown from studies of lowering of puberty age (7 years for girls and 9 years for boys in USA)that children are suffering due to early activation of sexuality. 3. The business factors involved in pushing the child sex education can not be overlooked. It is a huge industry - from condoms, drugs, early pregnancy termination, to social services and flesh trade. 4. Sexual exploitation and sexual diseases should be prevented by using alternative methods. During the deployment of Indian armed forces in Sierra Leone, several years ago, the moral and cultural education implemented by Indian commanders kept every Indian soldier (irrespective of religion) away from contracting HIV, whereas all other countries with full implementation of sex education and condoms had to send dozens of their soldiers back after contracting HIV. 5. Ability to write a few catchy words - knowledge economy, access to information, or education, is no substitute to thoughtful and considered ideas. It is important to learn all the circumstances and use all the resources available locally to devise ideas and programs. India has its culture as the most effective tool for implementation, but that may require activation of a few more nerve cells in the brain, and may also require alteration in many imported practices over several decades.
Ritu · 16 May 2007
I don't mean to sound a reductionist and don't want to compare two different cultures but women do experience things differently. Most of us at the age of 20 don't even know their proper monthly cycle, they think masturbation is a sin, they have never seen their vagina, they can't even say the words like periods, vagina, penis without looking in to a million directions. We have people sending in queries to newspaper asking questions about how to have babies even after 5-6 years of marriage. I am sure flesh trade and sexual abuse happened 60 years back but now it's out in the open and we have to deal with it. Come up with solutions. The negative side cannot be denied but it's scary to see parents not telling their children about their bodies. They get to know about these things from all the wrong sources and that's half knowledge which is pretty useless and in fact harmful. You are right when you say, the age for puberty is low now not only in the U.S but in our country too. But I don't think not telling children about sexuality is the solution.
dr dhrupad · 12 September 2008
it is very well known to one and all that more concealed things are kept, more one becomes curious about the same... and as everyone knows just as partial nudity is more seductive and pure nudity is most of the time artistic similarly non-concealed things would undoubtedly lead new generation to select good... otherwise just out of inquisitiveness unnecessarily many psychological arises out of misconception about sex... it is better to give educaiton and let one select his/her own future after being aware...