Education Kerala

Kerala revises controversial school textbook

The K N Panikkar committee recommended a change in a controversial chapter of a social sciences textbook that triggered violent agitation on the grounds that it promoted atheism and communism. P N Venugopal has more.

Four months ago, Kerala was rocked by an agitation demanding the withdrawal of the Social Science textbook prescribed for the VII standard, alleging that the second lesson in the textbook promoted atheism and communism.

The agitation which turned violent was led by the Kerala Students Union (KSU), the students wing of the Congress party, the opposition United Democratic Front (UDF), the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), the Christian church and organisations, the Muslim clergy and organisations and the Nair Service Society (NSS), a dominant caste organization.

The government refused to withdraw the book and in an attempt for reconciliation appointed an 18-member committee to study the issue.

The forces which had aligned against the textbook, are not happy with the changes. But the agitation has lost its steam.

Textbook turns into political row

Gujarat textbook: biases and errors

The committee headed by Dr K N Panikkar recommended in its final report submitted on 17th October that the textbook need not be withdrawn and that the controversial chapter be taught with the changes it had recommended in its interim report. Accordingly, the State Council of Educational Research and Training (SCERT) has revised the lesson, reprinted the pages and the same has been supplied to all the schools free of cost.

Following are the changes that has been made:

The title “Religionless Jeevan” has been changed to “Freedom of Belief”. All the names viz: Jeevan, Anvar Rashid and Laksmi Devi have been deleted. Now the relevant passage reads:

After filling up the names of the student and his parents, the headmaster asked:

“Which religion should we note”?

“No need to note any.

“Caste?”

“The same.”

The headmaster leaned back on his chair and asked rather gravely: “What if he feels the need for a religion when he grows up?”

“He can choose his religion if and when he feels so.”

“Yes that too is possible.”

This is followed by a quote from the constitution as to what it says about secularism. The quote from Nehru’s testament has been replaced by a quote from one of his speeches, where he says that secularism is not the denial of religion, but the right to follow any belief of one’s choice. The only other change in the text is the insertion of a quote from Sree Narayana Guru, the great social reformer of Kerala: “A good human being is what matters, whatever the religion.”

In contrast, here is the original passage.

The controversial ‘Jeevan’ unit in the social science textbook. Pic: Quest.

“Son, what’s your name?”

“Jeevan”.

“Good…nice name. Father’s name?”

“Anvar Rasheed”.

“Mother’s name?”

“Lakshmi Devi”.

The headmaster looked at the parents and asked: “Which religion should we note”?

“No need to note any. Please mention ‘no religion’.”

“Caste?”

“The same.”

The headmaster leaned back on his chair and asked rather gravely: “What if he feels the need for a religion when he grows up?”

“He can choose his religion if and when he feels so.”

People comparing the revised version with the old passage say that the message is still the same.

“The message that lesson tried to convey was that one does not have to be bound by the chains of religions or the incident of one’s birth; but is free to live a life of one’s own choice,” says Dr R V G Menon, a renowned educationist. “I don’t think that the changes that have been made dilutes that message,” he adds.

Sr Brijit, teacher, St John De Britto High School, Fort Cochin concurs with the opinion that the message has not changed. But her perspective is slightly different. “The changes are only cosmetic and the original intent has been retained.”

The forces, which had aligned against the textbook, are not happy with the changes. But the agitation had lost its steam with the death of 48-year-old James Augustine, a teacher, two months ago. Augustine was assaulted by the protestors at Kuzhissery in Malappuram district where he had come to attend a monthly teachers training programme and the general reaction against the agitation reached its pinnacle.

The Kerala society has apparently moved on to other issues.

Filed under

Education Kerala

Cite this article

P N Venugopal (2008) ‘Kerala revises controversial school textbook’, India Together, 9 November 2008. https://indiatogether.org/textbook-education--2/

3 reader responses

Add a response

An editor reads every response before it appears. Links are not published, and no email address is asked for or stored.

  1. robin · 19 November 2008

    Sirs: Well, the best massage is no massage at all in Social Studies "text books", specially in a multi-ethnic society found in India. What SHOULD be the contents of SS text books in modern India? Should these form ideas/ideals based upon peoples' private lives or should they contain models to emulate? Certainly, one's private obsessions cannot be raised to curriculum levels. What you commonly term “religion”should e the exclusive and private privilege of individual. How it- the individual- aligns itself with any established religion(s) is its business. Much like eating, recreation etc, ritualistics and ancient dopes be bottled up to it. Models of society seemed to have been pronounced pretty broadly y the guru “a good human being is what matters”. This is it. Text books should put forward how such objectives have been evolving and help students think critically-- in the open society context-- what should be their roles in fostering this evolution, and given multi-ethnicity, what Attitudes, Laws could be consistent with harmonious coexistence with proximity and afar. Contents may broadly foster five Pillars -Maintenance of the Earth -Maintenance of the Air -Maintenance of the Water Public Hygiene Private Hygiene No “religion” ancient pagan or prophecied ever formulated any such architecture of multi-ethnic society for its decent survival and sustenance. None. You can get the rest of the critical thinking from K.

  2. the blue one · 8 December 2008

    thanks for this article.iam a keralite living outside the state for educational purposes.and i think the agitation against the lesson was unnecessary and such a lesson is a good step to counter the increasing communalisation of society and politicization which we are witnessing today

  3. R.Sajan · 15 January 2009

    The text book Agitation had nothing to do with the Lesson 'Mathamillaattha Jeevan". It was only the Catholic Church flexing its muscles to blackmail the LDF into accommodating them more in the juicy Self-financing College issue. The Church also had to consolidate their lambs in the onslaught of several sex-scandals about the Church.